Jimmy Lim Design
Architects
Imagineers
Conceptioneers
 
 

8 Jalan Scott, Brickfields
50470 KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA

Tel: 603 2274 2207 / 2274 2368 / 2274 2369
Fax: 603 2274 3519
Email: cslcyy9@tm.net.my
cslcyy@yahoo.com.uk
c_star@tm.net.my
csl_associates@yahoo.com.my

 
 
About Us
  Philosophy
  What about you
  Links
  2 How to locate us?
  3 What do we do?
  4 What have we done?
  5 Media Publications
 

 

 

 

 
 
6.   Links    

KL Heritage House
More content coming soon.

   1. History Heritage
More content coming soon.

100 Cintra Street
More content coming soon.

History of 100 Cintra Street

The property was granted in 1801 as part of an alienation south
of Kampong Malabar.  The
building was built around 1881 as the residence of a wealthy Thai Mdm.Myroon Koon Nye Sone, a widow, who was the daughter of Phya Bichit Sone Kuan of Church Street Penang.  It changed hands many times.Immediately, prior to it becoming a Hotel 

owned by the present owners, it was the communal home of the ‘black and white’ servants from China, called ‘Tung-koong’ servants.  It was sold to the present owners by a Mr Chor Bah Say, a notable landowner of the period, in 1949 for a sum of twenty thousand Straits Settlement dollars.

It had been used as a Hotel from 1936.  In 1976 it was extensively renovated and converted to an air-conditioned “modern” supermarket, was destroyed by fire in 1986 when the tenant moved out.  Except for the load bearing part of the structure, nothing of the timber components was left.  The Local Authority with due diligence immediately after the fire issued instructions that whatever structure that was left had to be demolished*.

 

* A proposed “Adaptive re-use for the Rebuilding and Restoration of 100 Cintra Street, Penang A One-stop Cultural Expose and Heritage Centre”,- A Heritage Bazaar for Penang’s Cultural Past, 24 Sept 1999.
.

  1. Folk Museum
    More content coming soon.
  2. Pomegranate (shop)
    More content coming soon.
  3. Accommodation
    More content coming soon.

 

     

Teak & Coconut Grove
More content coming soon.

  1. Accommodation
    More content coming soon.
  2. Local Historic Site
    More content coming soon.

Project Description

Situated in the city of Georgetown, on the island of Penang, off the West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia, this project is an extension to an existing Pre-War timber framed bungalow. It is the architect’s Ancestral family home on a 36,000 sf of flat land. The brief called for a series of “mini self-contained Chalets” to be built for each of the architect’s siblings and their respective families. The existing building would be maintained for the Patriarch of the family and common activities such as dining and entertaining.

The site was complex and numerous considerations with regards to the surrounding built environment (modern apartment blocks, heavily trafficked road and office buildings adjacent), the existing natural environment (mature fig trees of about 100 years old and about 150 feet tall; another tropical fruit tree of the cherry family, about 100 years old, called locally the “kerian” tree; numerous coconut trees over 30 years old and a large open garden with numerous other trees and historical sentimental value to the family), and naturally, the existing residence that had been the home for 3 generations of the family.

What has resulted are 3 small interconnected units tucked onto the Western boundary. Raised 1 floor above the existing ground level, it takes full advantage of the natural prevailing breezes through the site and screens the existing home from harsh Western sunlight. Each unit has space for 1 family of 4 with either 2 or 3 bedrooms and an adjoining bath/shower.

Each unit is interconnected by either open showers and timber walkways, or a large communal timber deck. By raising the floor 1 story above the ground, a large sheltered multi purpose open space has been created below. This now serves as an outdoor studio for painting and general outdoor relaxation. Otherwise it is the entertainment space.

The original porte-cochere had been converted with a raised platform for outdoor dining while the main entrance has had a large raised patio that leads down into the new car porch. With large roof overhangs, the entrance has developed into the perfect casual outdoor meeting area for the family to sit and relax.

As the name implies, Teak trees were introduced to the site. Over 45 Teak tree saplings were purchased from the Forestry Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM) and planted on the site prior to construction commencing on 1st April 1999. They are now officially the fastest growing Teak trees in the country far outpacing the growth of those in FRIM.

Zero energy Materials, Structure and Construction

This building is unique in that it was built almost entirely of recycled timber materials to strife for an architecture using ‘zero’ energy. Apart from the concrete footings and granite piers, the rest, - from timber structure to roof and finishes are recycled! Even the sinks were from an old bungalow that had been torn down.

It was also unique in that the architect spent most of the construction period living on site and personally overseeing the entire construction process and in constant communication with the construction team.

Prior to commencement of works, only the basic layouts and location of footings for the oversized granite-stone columns were confirmed. All detail design was deliberately left unconfirmed so as to allow for the improvisation for recycled and ‘zero’ energy materials. Just prior to and during the construction process the architect personally sourced old doors, windows, tiles, timber for construction, vintage ceiling fans etc…








As such the design was very much an improvisation. If likened to music it could be compared to an improvised Jazz piece where the musician is not confined to a set piece but can change to further express his desires. It was therefore imperative that the architect was on site on a constant basis to ensure that utilization of these elements was always deliberate and in line with the design philosophy.

All floors throughout the building were of timber strips with gaps and openings at strategic locations to allow for natural ventilation through while still maintaining the user’s privacy. Voids were located at staircases to further enhance the natural ventilation while virtually 60% of the façade were of louvered timber windows that could be opened and closed as required.

Dividing walls between bathrooms and outdoor areas were either completely omitted or in some cases built from old green beer bottles. It was determined that privacy from the sky was not an issue that would concern the users.

The pitched roof structure entirely of timber, were designed to complement and follow the same pitches of the existing building. Natural antique clay roof Roman tiles laid with concrete mortar, over a metal deck ensured that no insulation was required as in tropical downpours, the Roman roof tiles would retain water that cooled the building during evaporation.

Project Significance and Impact
Conservation awareness
This project is highly significant in many ways especially when taken in the context of where Penang as a historic city, is heading. Georgetown Penang is one of the most historically significant parts of Malaysia. Along with Malacca, it is applying to be listed as one of UNESCO’s World Heritage Sites. Besides the tail end of the IT industry it, currently relies heavily on the Tourist dollar.
Unfortunately in the last 15 years, Penang has lost many of their buildings and historically significant sites due to a rapid rate of development. Many family estates that previously numbered in their hundreds have made way for multi storey office complexes and apartment blocks and are now few and far between. While development is inevitable, Penang has not seen any alternatives to developing a lifestyle that takes advantage of their heritage, environment and architecture. Instead many choose a
so called “modern” lifestyle - that which is in fact a poor copy by locals of a “western” lifestyle. Multi storey, glass clad, air conditioned apartment blocks have sprouted up all over the island. The fact is that 60% of them remain empty.

Noticing this decline, it was the intention of the architect and his family to set an example and illustrate that, an alternative lifestyle that provides all the modern amenities for living, and still maintain one’s own cultural





and historical identity without compromise was possible. As such the estate was recently opened to the public for visits, overnight stays and school tours. This has proven to be overwhelmingly popular with visits by many local dignitaries.

It is also an example of adaptive reuse taken to another level where the recycling of and using of ‘zero’ energy materials has resulted in a unique design that takes advantage of the fact that the materials are not new. The fact is that recycled materials have many advantages, some of which are that cost of materials is significantly reduced as is the construction period. This is one very attractive aspect of this building. When people hear of the costs incurred, they are often amazed at how little it costs.

It is also considered by many locals that one cannot do without air-conditioning in the tropics. This building is an example where there is absolutely no air-conditioning required at any time. All spaces are naturally ventilated and in the event of a tropical downpour can still maintain excellent cross ventilation without having to close off windows and openings. This naturally reduces the load on the environment with regards to energy cost.

In a multi racial country like Malaysia, it has often been asked that with a country as young as ours, where does one look for a cultural and historical identity in its architecture. Historically it was the British colonials who first brought their colonial influences from the colonies. In modern times, it can be said that Malaysians have looked to the West for their inspiration.

The bane of modern developing countries especially post Colonial communities, still portray a sense of inferiority and harbour the notion that anything from the West is “best” and anything that is “white” is Right. In the final analysis this project has tried to demonstrate that creativity need not be to regurgitate familiar tested icons. It can be a putting together of many differing ideas subscribing towards a common programme. This project embodies many elements from traditional architecture, simple timber window-stops, traditional timber door-latches and related cultural elements,
coconut shells for lamps, timber off-cuts as sill-boards, bamboo wine making sieve for lampshade, reflect the single minded-ness of its intent. Using canvas as an alternative to glass, for operable windows, introduces a different dimension to the architecture when viewed externally at night. The architecture becomes a lighted lantern.

This is as example of one architect’s honest response and solution to this question. It responds to the built and natural environment and establishes a dialogue between old and new, historical and modern, people and architecture. This is the architect’s statement about living in Malaysia today.

     

Use of Recycled Materials

THE THINKING AND RATIONALISATION IN USING RECYCLED BUILDING COMPONENTS AND MATERIALS.

What we discovered in our analyses of the environment we live in that the use and reuse of building components and materials is a very integral part of our existence. It is sustainable and renewing resources that had consumed considerable energy in its production.

Architecture and what we create ultimately last much longer than their creators. There are many ancient structures still standing to reflect the greatness of the architects or the artists. Their creations outlast them.

In the RITES OF THE TROPIC we highlighted that History can be a Juxta-positioning of memories focus one’s vista on the journey/passage of time and history. It contextualises the visual composition, and that Tropical architecture allows for a Symbiotic relationship between Man-made elements and Nature, is a cerebral relationship laced with emotions and memories, it embraces totally all of one’s senses. The intertwining of Nature with Man-made structure celebrates this symbiotic relationship.

HISTORY CAN BE A JUXTA-POSITIONING OF MEMORIES

The statement “History can be a Juxta-positioning of memories focus one’s vista on the journey/passage of time and history. It contextualises the visual composition” of the contemporary to the past. The use of re-cycled materials and components subscribe to and support this statement. Using materials from old buildings contextualises the new project with its heritage and creates the sense of “the passage of time”. In constructing new structures, the introduction of elements of the heritage not only enriches the design but also provides timelessness to the interior spaces.

In looking at history and understanding the past it forces the architect to assume a position of humility. This we have often referred to as one of the most important guiding principle in the practise of architecture. Architecture begins with humility on the part of the architect. He looks at all elements with a sense of humility and absorbs all into his system where he accepts and understands them. After attaining all the necessary information and understanding these constraints, he then engages himself in the “Tai-Chi” of architecture, and produce the most fantastic architecture that embodies all elements encountered. Good architecture comes from the “Architecture of Humility” followed by the ”Tai-Chi of Architecture”.

Material that matured and aged through time has a patina value unattainable through artificial means. The texturing of wood grains and other embellishments of the natural material through ageing had a mellowness of touch and colour, an indicative manifestation of time. Time takes precedence over Man. Man is only temporal. Our works outlast us. Materials outlast us. Using recycled materials is the architect paying homage and demonstrating humility to the material, passage of time, craft of the time and the craftsmen who executed the works. Pieces of recyclable pieces also represent bits of mosaic from the past. Properly placed together could and should provide clues for us about our past for striking forth into the future. Only then could modern works of Asian architecture be substantial and based on tangible arguments. Here lies the importance of architectural heritage and old building components. Wholesale rejection of the old is misconceived. In the pursuit for modernism.
many post-ideological dependent nations have rejected their past only for the rationale of “catching up” with the West.

Cho Wei

  1. Architect/Designer
    More content coming soon.

Wei Ling

  1. Jewellery Gem
    More content coming soon.
  2. Weiling Gallery
    www.weiling-gallery.com
    To link monthly exhibitions








 

 




TROPICAL ARCHITECTURE ALLOWS FOR A SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAN AND NATURE

Tropical architecture allows for a symbiotic relationship between Man-made elements and Nature, is a cerebral relationship laced with emotions and memories, it embraces totally all of one’s senses. In the relationship between Man and nature, Man is temporal. Nature was here before Man imposed upon it and nature will be here after Man has gone. The ruin palace complexes of the Angkor civilisation in Siem Reap are fantastic examples of how and what nature could do. Nature will claim what is hers. Architecture that contributes towards the intertwining of Nature with Man-made structure celebrates this symbiotic relationship. Recycled building material is Nature fossilised in time. Re-introducing it and re-working it into modern architecture celebrates this relationship.

Within the global quest for renewable and sustainable architecture in the context of the dwindling world energy resources, the reusing of recycled materials that utilises zero energy is arguably subscribing towards this concern. Buildings built from recycled materials and relying on natural ventilation using minimal energy required to operate surely must be the direction architects should be heading for. Modern materials require tremendous amount of energy to produce. Steel and aluminium two of the all time favourite materials for construction require mega-watts to produce when compared to timber. Most of the traditional components used for recycling purpose are timber based. Total usage of recycled components is not encouraged. Sparing use with sensitivity is encouraged.

CONCLUSION

Talking about recycling materials ultimately leads to the question of recycled buildings. In this respect every heritage building no matter how old or dilapidated has a potential. Vernacular architecture has an important role to play towards a new direction for modern architecture. Therefore the















retention of some of these buildings for future reference is important and should not for the slightest reason be demolished. Heritage buildings are;

Never too Old to be reused
Any building no matter how derelict or poorly maintained can be rebuilt and reconstructed and or restored if the need rise.

Economy of Preserving Heritage buildings.
Rebuilding of heritage or old buildings do not have to cost a large investment to refurbish.

A Living and continuing Heritage. The people are descendants of a rich heritage and are still an integral part of a living heritage their continuing to live the way they have been doing is part of a preservation of the continuing a heritage. Under the circumstances rebuilding of historic buildings do not have to maintain the original fabric but as long as a reference to the old spirit and tradition is retained.

Sustainability of heritage buildings.
After the rebuilding of a heritage building it ought to provide some form of return for the investment and bring in some income, modest that it may be. The viability of maintaining the building makes it preservation.

Many buildings once derelict tend to be disregarded and written off as non-usable, or that the reconstruction cost is too prohibitive.

Conservation of historic buildings has all to do about preserving one’s past and keeping it as a reference for the future generations to understand the heritage and may be the path or a track for a route forward. It had been said that for Man to go forward he needs go back to the past to chart and plot a course using the past as a guide to move forward without losing track of the past. This is where Asian architects in surging forward for modernity have forgotten the past and the great civilisation that we have originated from.

The past is important for the present, as the present will be for the future. The future will be the present and the present will be the past, just as today is the future of the past and to-day will be the past of the future.












Last Updated : 6 February 2007
Website First Created: 4 November 2005
____________________________________________________________________________________________